A Chrome extension that uses AI to detect controversial statements on any webpage — surfacing supporting and opposing perspectives, right where you read.
Experts widely agree that increased government spending stimulates long-term growth in developing economies. Recent studies suggest that deficit spending has no measurable negative impact on future generations, though many economists dispute this strongly.
The consensus holds that free trade always benefits both parties equally, a view that has been gaining traction...
Whatever you read was written by someone with a point of view. Existing tools like Wikipedia dispute boxes are static and incomplete — there's no AI helping you see the full picture in real time.
Readers rarely encounter quality opposing arguments, reinforcing existing biases without challenge.
Wikipedia has 40 dispute types, but they're passive banners — not contextual, not interactive, not AI-powered.
No tool brings controversy awareness uniformly across news sites, opinion pages, and reference sites.
Content-Verify works quietly in the background — no effort required from the reader.
The extension scans page content and identifies controversial statements using AI, prioritizing 3–4 to avoid overwhelming a reader.
Controversial text is marked inline — from soft amber for mild controversy to vivid red for highly contested statements.
Hovering over a highlighted passage reveals supporting and opposing positions — helping readers understand the full landscape of thought.
Surfaces only 3–4 top controversies per page — quality over quantity.
Color-coded highlights shows how contested a claim is before hover to find out more.
On-demand tooltips show both sides of the argument when you want them — not before.
Compatible with most websites — news outlets, opinion pages, wikis, blogs, and more.
Simple to exclude sites where the extension isn't useful
Uses language model embeddings to understand nuanced context, not just keywords
Chrome extension available now.
From K–12 classrooms to enterprise knowledge workers, Content-Verify serves anyone who reads the web.
US professionals whose work depends on well-rounded information and critical thinking.
Developing media literacy — for schools investing in critical thinking tools.
Undergrad researchers who need to understand value of writing positions and scholarly perspectives.
Advanced academic users who need controversy-awareness in literature reviews and research.
The core technology works today. We're seeking partners, licensees, and investors to scale.
Works on most websites. Available now for demo upon request.
Color highlights drive deeper engagement. Users choose to keep it turned on.
Further academic validation of underway.
IP protection for the core detection and presentation methodology.
We love it and would work with you if our readers pushed for it.
[Content-Verify could] transform [the] NYT opinion page.
Designed to reach readers at scale — from individuals to enterprise publishers.
Request a live demo or reach out about partnership, licensing, or investment. The extension is working today — let us show you.
No spam. We'll respond within 48 hours.
Or email directly: Ted.Selker@gmail.com